In that respect, the Supreme Court (as the apex adjudicatory body) would rarely disturb itself with that finding of fact, being a concurrent finding.ĪN APPELLATE COURT VIS-À-VIS FINDING OF FACT On the other hand, a concurrent finding of fact can only result where both a Trial Court and an Appellate Court have made such a finding. The law is thus trite that once a trial court makes a finding of fact, an Appellate Court is reluctant, nay, careful to interrupt same. This leaves the trial Court with the unenviable responsibility of believing or disbelieving these facts as placed before her, thereby making a finding of same.įinding of facts is more appropriately employed to describe an affirmation of fact made after considering evidence it connotes a determination of a fact by the court as averred by one party, denied by the other, and founded on evidence in a case. Parties in dispute before a trial Court would often lay out favourable facts in strong support of their respective cases, making attempts to justify every fact. I dare say, the law does not give meaning to itself, rather, the meaning of the law is evinced through the facts in dispute.Ĭonsidering the fundamental role facts play in adjudication, little wonder why Courts of law always desire to be seized of the entire facts placed before them by disputants, with a view to doing justice as duty-bound. Without being repetitive, the facts agitated in a case invariably give meaning to the law parties, urge the Court to apply in the resolution of their disputes whereupon issues have been joined. Such laws ought to be cited in the light of the facts on which they are decided, because facts give life and meaning to the consideration the Court would carefully make before applying the law. It is a good law that a case is decided on the facts before the Court. Send us feedback about these examples.Facts and Law are undoubtedly intrinsic to proper adjudication, hence, appreciating the intermingling of these two concepts can never be overemphasized. These examples are programmatically compiled from various online sources to illustrate current usage of the word 'fact finder.' Any opinions expressed in the examples do not represent those of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Eric Lach, The New Yorker, 24 July 2019 See More director, sees himself as a fact finder, a scrupulous prosecutor. 2019 The Chicago Teachers Union has rejected a 16 percent raise over five years offered by the city and recommended by an independent fact finder and the union has laid the groundwork for a strike. 2020 Had Danney been willing to testify regarding his treatment of these and other athletes, Plaintiff would be entitled to have the fact finder weigh the scope of Danney’s activities. Ben Leonard, /maryland/carroll, 16 Oct. Bob Sandrick, cleveland, 12 July 2021 In non-jury trials, the judge becomes the fact finder and applies the law. Bob Sandrick, cleveland, 12 July 2021 North Royalton Finance Director Eric Dean said the firefighters union has also accepted the fact finder’s terms. 2022 The difference is that firefighters, at the fact finder’s recommendation, were given a three-year contract. David Jesse, Detroit Free Press, 5 Sep. Bob Sandrick, cleveland, 12 July 2021 The fact finder can make recommendations, but does not have authority to bind the sides to a contract. Recent Examples on the Web The terms were recommended by a fact finder appointed by the State Employment Relations Board after talks broke down earlier this year between the city and the International Association of Fire Fighters AFL-CIO Local 2156, which represents North Royalton firefighters.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |